Submitted by Paul Daley on
While some people have valued the opportunity to reconnect with the long lost objects of their ancestors, others are heartbroken that their sacred cultural property will soon be returned to the British Museum
Henrietta Fourmile Marrie stands at the podium, a diminutive figure at a lower corner of the cavernous stage.
The white invaders fashioned a copper breastplate for her great-grandfather, Ye-I-Nie, which, in acknowledgment of his reputation as a peacemaker, named him “King of Cairns”. And even though he long ago passed away, there he is today, Ye-I-Nie, wearing his breastplate and head dress, his skin marked with the tribal ligatures of Yidindji, as he looks out across his great-granddaughter’s left shoulder and into the eyes of a transfixed audience.
In two weeks time that spirit will be gone again. And I feel that when I walk past him – it is so heavy
Related: Battle for bark art: Indigenous leaders hail breakthrough in talks with British Museum
What people want is ... for the museum to bring itself to them
Related: Preservation or plunder? The battle over the British Museum’s Indigenous Australian show
Related: Encounters exhibition: a stunning but troubling collection of colonial plunder
There is not one generic response that fits the needs of all and even within communities opinions may differ
The analogy of rape as it is applied to what has happened to our cultural heritage is not far-fetched
Related: Enduring controversy: BP sponsorship ignites new row over British Museum's Indigenous exhibition
- Log in to post comments